Things To Know About A Deposition Summary

Man and a woman sat at a desk working on legal documents

When it comes to the law, you want to make sure you do all you can before the trial. A deposition transcript may be hundreds of pages, and that would be too much for any lawyer to remember. A deposition summary can help guide the lawyer by looking at the main points to prepare them to argue your case. Here are some things to know about a deposition summary.

What’s the Point of a Deposition Summary?

Legal jargon can take forever to get through, especially with certain documents reaching a few hundred pages. You might need an attorney from to help you truncate the main points of each testimony to prove your point in court. A deposition summary would be great to handle a simple litigation matter.

When a lawyer has a short-form version of depositions, it’ll help him stay organized. Here are some things that your attorney will include in the summary: topic, page-line, cross-examinations, and pleadings to get the facts straight for the trial.

Types of Deposition Summaries

Depending on the situation, your lawyer has different deposition summary methods. There are three main ones he’ll use to help you out:

Page-Line Summary

Here’s a format that aligns the page-line and exhibit reference. The lawyer outlines the summary in the same manner as the transcript. You’ll see these more so for financial transactions and disputes.

Topical Summary

This type of summary stems from pre-defined topics. The lawyer can provide a quick overview of the deposition from the subject matter presented.

Some of the topics covered are the legal elements or conditions. A topical summary comes in handy for Worker’s Compensation lawsuits to argue the best case for accident matters.

Chronological Summary

A chronological summary organizes the facts presented chronologically. This format is made for criminal cases to help tell the sequence of events in chronological order.

What to Include in the Deposition Summary?

A deposition summary is a very by-the-book approach. It needs relevant facts from the witness, an objective summary without any spins or alterations from the original points made, and no editorials. The legal theories have to be tied directly to relevant information in the lawsuit.

Leave a Reply